Home > Public Domain Data > Maps as representations of reality: The deciduous-coniferous tree “line”

Maps as representations of reality: The deciduous-coniferous tree “line”

One of the themes running through our book The GIS Guide to Public Domain Data is that maps are representations of reality.  While almost everyone reading this statement is likely to agree with it, in the fast-paced world that GIS analysis and creating maps has become, it is easy to lose sight of this fact when staring at tables, maps, and imagery.  In a recent video, I discuss just one place where care needs to be made in making decisions based on spatial data.  In the video, observe my surroundings as I stand near the traditional “line” that divides the deciduous forest to the south from the coniferous forest to the north in North America. Is the “line” really a line at all, or is it better described as a gradual change from deciduous to coniferous as one travels north?  Is that vector line then better symbolized as a “zone”, or is vegetation better mapped as a raster data set, with each cell representing the percentage of deciduous and coniferous trees?

How many other data sets do we tend to see as having firm boundaries, when the boundaries are not really firm at all in reality?  How does that affect the decisions we make with them?  Even the boundary between wetlands and open water were originally interpreted based on land cover data or a satellite or aerial image.   As we state in the book, even contour lines were often interpreted originally from aerial stereo pairs.  And each data set was collected at a specific scale, with certain equipment and software, at a specific date, and within certain margins of error that the organization established.  Maps are representations of reality.  They are incredibly useful representations to be sure, but care needs to be taken when using this or any abstracted data.

Advertisements
  1. December 22, 2015 at 3:04 pm

    Flood maps fall in this category. I’ve seen insurance companies make plenty of decisions based on one of those FEMA vector flood maps. One side of the line you get insurance, the other side of the line you don’t. As you say, only one of many possible representations of reality.

    • josephkerski
      December 22, 2015 at 3:06 pm

      Very good point, Robert! We get so used to these “lines” as being “one side x, the other side y”, don’t we? Thanks for commenting.

      –Joseph Kerski

  1. November 9, 2012 at 6:25 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: