Be a Wise Consumer of Fun Posts, too!
Around this time of year, versions of the following story seem to make their way around the internet:
The passenger steamer SS Warrimoo was quietly knifing its way through the waters of the mid-Pacific on its way from Vancouver to Australia. The navigator had just finished working out a star fix & brought the master, Captain John Phillips, the result. The Warrimoo’s position was LAT 0º 31′ N and LON 179 30′ W. The date was 31 December 1899.
“Know what this means?” First Mate Payton broke in, “We’re only a few miles from the intersection of the Equator and the International Date Line”. Captain Phillips was prankish enough to take full advantage of the opportunity for achieving the navigational freak of a lifetime. He called his navigators to the bridge to check & double check the ships position. He changed course slightly so as to bear directly on his mark. Then he adjusted the engine speed. The calm weather & clear night worked in his favor.
At midnight the SS Warrimoo lay on the Equator at exactly the point where it crossed the International Date Line! The consequences of this bizarre position were many: The forward part (bow) of the ship was in the Southern Hemisphere & the middle of summer. The rear (stern) was in the Northern Hemisphere & in the middle of winter. The date in the aft part of the ship was 31 December 1899. Forward it was 1 January 1900. This ship was therefore not only in two different days, two different months, two different years, two different seasons, but in two different centuries – all at the same time.
I have successfully used many types of geographic puzzles with students and with the general public over the years, and I enjoy this story a great deal. But in keeping with our reminders on this blog and in our book to “be critical of the data,” reflections on the incorrect or absent aspects to this story can be instructive as well as heighten interest. The SS Warrimoo was indeed an actual ship that was built by Swan & Hunter Ltd in Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK, in 1892, and was sunk after a collision with a French destroyer during World War I in 1918. Whether it was sailing in the Pacific in 1899, I do not know.
The version of this story on CruisersForum states that it is “mostly true.” What lends itself to scrutiny? Let us investigate a few of the geographic aspects in the story.
First, the statement, “working out a star fix” leaves out the fact that chronometers were used to work out the longitude, rather than a sextant. (And I highly recommend reading the book Longitude by Dava Sobel). Second, the International Date Line (IDL) as we know it today was not in place back in 1899. The nautical date line, not the same as the IDL, is a de jure construction determined by international agreement. It is the result of the 1917 Anglo-French Conference on Time-keeping at Sea, which recommended that all ships, both military and civilian, adopt hourly standard time zones on the high seas. The United States adopted its recommendation for U.S. military and merchant marine ships in 1920 (Wikipedia).
Third, the distance from LAT 0º 31′ N and LON 179 30′ W to LAT 0º 0′ N and LON 180′ W is about 42 nautical miles, and the ship could have traveled at a speed of no more than 20 knots (23 mph). Therefore, conceivably, the ship could have reached the 0/180 point in a few hours, but whether it could have maneuvered in such a way to get the bow and stern in different hemispheres is unlikely, given the accuracy of measurement devices at the time. Sextants have an error of as at least 2 kilometers in latitude, and chronographs about 30 kilometers in longitude. Or, they could already have reached the desired point earlier in the day and not have known it. Even 120 years later, in my own work with GPS receivers at intersections of full degrees of latitude and longitude, it is difficult to get “exactly” on the desired point: Look carefully at the GPS receiver in my video at 35 North Latitude 81 West Longitude as an example. An interesting geographic fact is that, going straight East or West on the Equator along a straight line, it is possible to cross the dateline three times (see map below).
Our modern digital world is full of fragments that are interesting if not completely accurate, but as GIS professionals and educators, I think it is worth applying “be critical of the data” principles even to this type of information. The story is still interesting as a hypothetical “what could have happened” and provides great teachable moments even if the actual event never occurred.
The International Date Line (CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=147175).
Leave a comment Cancel reply
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- josephkerski on Fee vs. Free Geospatial Data: Like a Snow Shovel?
- Chad Kopplin on Fee vs. Free Geospatial Data: Like a Snow Shovel?
- josephkerski on An introduction to Ethics in GIS
- Is the debate over the ethical use of geospatial data dead? | diana maps on An introduction to Ethics in GIS
- josephkerski on Explore the world with the new Landsat Explorer
Tags
access Accuracy Amazon Apple ArcGIS Hub ArcGIS Online ArcGIS Pro big data Census census data Citizen science Cloud Computing Colorado Copernicus crowd-sourced Crowd Sourcing crowdsourcing data data formats Data Portal data portals data quality drones elevation environment Esri ethics EU Fee vs. Free geodata geospatial geospatial data Google Google Maps Government GPS health imagery Internet of Things land cover landsat library lidar location location information location privacy Metadata ocean on-line mapping open Open Data Open Source OpenStreetMap Ordnance Survey population portal portals privacy Public domain Public Domain Data raster remote sensing resolution satellite satellite imagery Scale spatial accuracy standards state tracking UAV UN USGS VGI waterArchives
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
One of my colleagues sent me this article about Mark Twain’s musings about time zones and the Equator, here: https://quadriv.wordpress.com/2011/10/02/mark-twain-and-the-s-s-warrimoo/ I love it.
The Mark Twain link shows that it was conventional before 1900 to adjust the date when crossing the 180th Meridian. The book “Following the Equator” (http://www.biblioteca.org.ar/libros/167735.pdf) was copyrighted in 1897 and Twain calls the meridian “the Great Meridian” rather than the International Date Line.
It seems to me reasonable that, if he was really that close, the captain of the Warrimoo may have decided to place his vessel as close as possible to the equator and the great meridian at the dawn of the new century.
The 20th century didn’t truly begin until 1/1/1901, rather than 1/1/1900. But people probably didn’t believe that any more in 1900 than they did in 2000 that it wasn’t a new millennium yet.
Great points – thanks for reading and replying! Hope all is well in Montana.
–Joseph Kerski
Love the map @ bottom, of which I took a humouristic twist as a concludign slide to young pros http://www.slideshare.net/azolnai/oil-price-and-innovation/12
Andrew – thanks for this – I love the strong man graphic in the Pacific – that will help me to remember the route that the date line follows from now on!
I also looked at your other slides – quite a story you have! I had forgotten about your Esri past service too! You should write this up in a book or something so people will understand your history but also an encouragement for students and those in the workforce to “keep reinventing yourself and be a lifelong learner” which you so well model!
–Joseph Kerski
The issue of accuracy is certainly relevant in this story, but your account here has a few issues. You say that the mention of a star fix ” leaves out the fact that chronometers were used to work out the longitude, rather than a sextant.” Not really. A chronometer gave Greenwich time, but a navigator needed local time to compare against it. The difference in time, Greenwich minus local, yielded the longitude at the standard rate of 15 degrees per hour (or 1 degree for every four minutes of time and so on… it’s just proportioning out 360 degrees in 24 hours). So how do you get local time? Until the middle of the 20th century, this was done by turning a sextant into an accurate sundial: measuring the altitude of the sun or a star would yield local time (after a few simple corrections for things like refraction, and in the case of the Sun, the equation of time). Later you say that the accuracy of this was only “about 30 km in longitude”. I suspect you’re thinking of the very first timepieces that could be counted as chronometers, like Harrison’s. By 1899/1900 the time kept by a typical chronometer was a few seconds after some weeks at sea, and many vessels carried three (or more!) chronometers. The error in the sextant sight for local time also added an error of a few seconds. The net implied an uncertainty comparable to or or perhaps double the uncertainty in latitude: a few miles for each. Needless to say, the vessel could not have been positioned with anything like the accuracy implied in the story. It’s a tall tale.
Frank Reed
Clockwork Mapping / ReedNavigation.com
Conanicut Island USA
Thanks Frank for the clarification!
I looked at your ReedNavigation site… very important work you are doing and I salute you.
You might like my new book:
In it I wrote several chapters on instrumentation, surveying, mapping, exploration, and so on.
–Joseph Kerski
Another problem with this story is that the 20th century began on Jan 1, 1901, since there was no year “0”; the first year would be year “1”, and so forth.
Good point, Phil! Just like a few years back on 1 Jan 2000, all those articles saying, we’re really not in the 21st Century quite yet….
A friend of mine researched the sailing schedules of the Warrimoo and found that she was indeed in the area at the end of December in both 1899 and again a year later in 1900. So it was indeed possible. However, as you point out,the navigators, with the technology available at that date, could not possibly have measured their position to the accuracy required.
Thanks Adam Q. Indeed. It could have very well happened, but even if not, it is fun to think about and is instructive for teaching purposes too, about lat-long, navigation and positional technologies, history, etc….
According to the National Ocean service (https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/international-date-line.html) the international date line was established in 1884, giving credence to the story, but have to agree with the discussion that it would be impossible at that time to determine its exact position. However, as you point out, fun to think about nonetheless….